In the 1st and 4th picture above, you can see a zoomed and panned
display of our destination airport, KLUM and the weather they were
being hammered by. 45,000' tops, with 35+kt winds, and the terror
of all terrors...HAIL! Over my years of flying the
RV-10 with WSI, I've learned a lot about what types of weather are
conducive to a good day of flying, and I knew that this could be good,
as long as we didn't have to get in anything with colors. If it's
widely greens and yellows, you may have a good smooth flight, but it'll
be rainy. Probably smooth. But, if you have very isolated
cells, you'll maybe have a bumpy day, or maybe not...but you CANNOT
penetrate anything with color at all, if it's widely scattered or
isolated. It was in the 70's that day at home, and I knew that
anything with color would mean build-ups, bumps, and nothing but
bad. Of course, if you can do it without flying into any of the
colors, you will probably be fine. It's nice to give
thunderstorms 20 miles of distance, but I've often found that depending
on the storm, if you're VFR, you can find an easy way by even if you're
closer...and the trailing side of the storm isn't always too bad.
We continued on, fixated on this storm, hoping to see that all the
colored heart of the storm would move North and East and blow past our
airport. I had plenty of doubts, but as we got closer and closer,
the storm moved little by little...not very quickly, but just
enough. Almost into Wisconsin, I queried the controllers twice
about what they saw on the Wx display. They said that the intense
and extreme stuff was passing the airport. I told them I may
shoot an approach at nearby KRGK. They asked if I was going to
land there then....I said "No...just an approach to get under it all so
I'm not in IMC". I forgot to mention that as I got closer, I was
above the tops and had a solid undercast.....and, experience again told
me that if it's solid undercast and I'm only at 9,000', it's likely
going to be a pretty smooth descent through the clouds. There
were no puffies, only smooth solid layers of clouds. I queried
them on the cell status and as I was 10 minutes from home, he said it
had all moved about 5 miles or so North and East. I decided I'd
give the approach a try, knowing that I was coming in from the South,
and the approach was flying East for Rwy 9.
As I descended into the grey clouds, we watched our path, and in the
2nd picture above you can see that the we could see that the approach
path was definitely clear of the cells. Keeping in mind that
there's a couple minutes of delay to the satellite weather, I knew that
the cell would have moved further, not closer, to the airport. So
we continued on, ready to break it off and go to KRGK if there were
bumps or any signs of anything negative. As we turned inbound for
the approach, there was a solid gap of nothingness between the approach
path and the cell, and I knew it would be fine. We were in stable
stratus clouds, and as we got lower and lower on the approach, we could
even see the occasional thin glimpse of ground passing by.
After passing the FAF and beginning our descent, we popped out with
maybe 2200-2500' ceilings, and could see the city in front of us.
I called airport in site, cancelled IFR, and we had a perfectly smooth
approach, and one of those landings where you don't feel the
touchdown...only hear the wheels being rolling on the wet runway
below. It was warm but overcast and comfortable, and we placed
the plane back in it's hangar for a well deserved rest.
|